Abstract
This arti cle seeks to give a fi nal, hand in hand with legal certainty, the so-cial legal issues generated by the lack of express regulation of the effects of interruption of the prescription of article 201 number 3 of the Tax Code. For this, from the specifi c case, answer the question based on the problem, that is, if once produced such an interruption begins or not a new period of pre-scription for the Treasury to pursue the payment of taxes, interest, penalties and other charges; examining the legal rules governing the institution, and analyzing the doctrine and jurisprudence on the subject
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2023 Revista Chilena de Derecho y Ciencia Política