Keywords
unconstitutionality
litigants
Supreme Court of Justice
Uruguay
Abstract
The literature on judicial politics posits that powerful litigants, the "haves", tend to prevail in court. Nevertheless, the evidence regarding litigants' success remains inconclusive and is limited to a few advanced democracies and some in Latin America. This article tests the generalizability of extant arguments within the unexplored context of the Uruguayan Supreme Court of Justice (SCJ). Using an original database of the SCJ's decisions on the constitutionality of laws issued between 1989 and 2021, we explore the applicability of party capability theory and its extensions. The findings of this study indicate that the advantage held by those with greater resources is conditional on the issue at stake and is mostly limited to economic issues. These findings offer a nuanced understanding of party capability theory and extend its study to a previously unexplored case in the Global South.
References
AGUIRRE, Gonzalo. (2013): “Leyes inconstitucionales”. Búsqueda (Montevideo), December 5, 2013. No. 1742. Available at: https://www.busqueda.com.uy/nota/leyes-inconstitucionales/ls-64429-40c3bfd5c21cad8180a2. [Accessed on: December 10, 2024].
ANSOLABEHERE, Karina Mariela; BOTERO, Sandra; & GONZÁLEZ OCANTOS, Ezequiel. (2022): “Conceptualizar y medir la cultura legal. Evidencia a partir de una encuesta a Jueces Federales Mexicanos”. Política y gobierno 29, No. 2, pp. 1-30.
ANTÍA, Florencia; LUJÁN, Diego; & VAIRO, Daniela. (2024): “Polarización Política y Comportamiento de La Suprema Corte de Justicia En Uruguay”. International Journal of Constitutional Law 22, No. 5, pp. 1498-1521.
ANTÍA, Florencia; & VAIRO, Daniela. (2023): “From Second-Best to First-Best Veto Point: Explaining the Changing Uses of Judicial Review and Referendums in Uruguay”. Latin American Politics and Society 65, No. 2, pp. 145-169.
ANTÍA, Florencia; GIUDICE GRAÑA, Lucía; & VAIRO, Daniela. (2023): “El Rol de La Suprema Corte de Justicia Ante La Judicialización de La Salud En Uruguay. Aportes Para La Descripción de La Cultura Jurídica Uruguaya”. International Journal of Constitutional Law 21, No. 5, pp. 1302-1331.
ANTÍA, Florencia; & VAIRO, Daniela. (2019): “Política y justicia en Uruguay: el poder de la Suprema Corte de Justicia (1990-2018)”. Revista Uruguaya de Ciencia Política 28, No. 2, pp. 61-86.
ATKINS, Burton M. (1991): “Party Capability Theory as an Explanation for Intervention Behavior in the English Court of Appeal”. American Journal of Political Science 35, No. 4, pp. 881-903.
BLANCO, Andrés; & CERETTA, Juan (eds.) (2021): Medicamentos de alto costo y poder judicial. (Montevideo, Fundación de Cultura Universitaria).
BOTERO, Sandra; ELLETT, Rachel; KECK, Thomas M.; & STOHLER, Stephan. (2021): “Free Expression and Judicial Power in Colombia, India, and South Africa”. Law & Social Inquiry 46, No. 2, pp. 331-363.
BRACE, Paul; YATES, Jeff; & BOYEA, Brent D. (2012): “Judges, Litigants, and the Design of Courts”. Law & Society Review 46, No. 3, pp. 497-522.
BRAMBOR, Thomas; CLARK, William Roberts; & GOLDER, Matt. (2006): “Understanding Interaction Models: Improving Empirical Analyses”. Political Analysis 14, No. 1, pp. 63-82.
BRINKS, Daniel M.; & BLASS, Abby. (2017): “Rethinking Judicial Empowerment: The New Foundations of Constitutional Justice”. International Journal of Constitutional Law 15, No. 2, pp. 296-331.
BRINKS, Daniel M, & GAURI, Varun (2012): “The Law’s Majestic Equality? The Distributive Impact of Litigating Social and Economic Rights”. Policy Research Working Paper 5999, World Bank.
BRINKS, Daniel M. (2008): The judicial response to police killings in Latin America. (New York, Cambridge University Press).
BÚSQUEDA. (2012): “Más de 70 recursos contra el ICIR”. Búsqueda (Montevideo), August 9, 2012. Available at: https://www.busqueda.com.uy/Secciones/Mas-de-70-recursos-contra-el-ICIR-uc5692. [Accessed on: December 3, 2024].
CASTAGNOLA, Andrea; BONZI, Gabriela; FRANCO, Shirley; and PÉREZ-LIÑÁN, Aníbal (2024): “Judicial Activism in Paraguay: A Reactive Form of Compensatory Justice”. In HAUSEGGER, Lori and URRIBARRI, Raul (eds.), Judicial Activism in Comparative Perspective (Bern, Peter Lang Verlag).
CHEN, K.-P.; HUANG, K.-C.; & LIN, C.-C. (2015): “Party Capability versus Court Preference: Why Do the ‘Haves’ Come Out Ahead? — An Empirical Lesson from the Taiwan Supreme Court”. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 31, No. 1, pp. 93-126.
DA SILVA, Virgílio Afonso & VARGAS TERRAZAS, Fernanda. (2011): “Claiming the Right to Health in Brazilian Courts: The Exclusion of the Already Excluded?” Law & Social Inquiry 36, No. 4, pp. 825-853.
DOTAN, Yoav. (1999): “Do the ‘Haves’ Still Come out Ahead? Resource Inequalities in Ideological Courts: The Case of the Israeli High Court of Justice”. Law & Society Review 33, No. 4.
DRYZEK, John S. (2025): “For Example: How to Use Examples in Political Science”. American Political Science Review 119, No. 1, pp. 449-461.
EPP, Charles. (1998): The rights revolution: Lawyers, activists, and supreme courts in comparative perspective (Chicago, University of Chicago Press).
FEDERACIÓN RURAL DEL URUGUAY. (2011): “Impuestos a la Tierra. Reflexiones de la Federación Rural”. Available at: http://sacl.com.uy/wordpress/?p=636. [Accessed on: July 1, 2024].
FERRAZ, Octávio Luiz Motta. (2011): “Harming the Poor Through Social Rights Litigation: Lessons from Brazil”. Texas Law Review 89, No. 7, pp. 1643-1668.
GALANTER, Marc. (1974): “Why the haves come out ahead? Speculations on the limits of legal change”. Law and Society Review 9, No. 1, pp. 95-160.
GROS ESPIELL, Héctor (2012): “El estatuto jurídico del juez constitucional. Uruguay”. In FIX-ZAMUDIO, Héctor & ASTUDILLO, César (eds.), Estatuto jurídico del juez constitucional en América Latina y Europa. Libro homenaje al doctor Jorge Carpizo (Mexico City, Instituto de Investigaciones Jurídicas, UNAM).
HANRETTY, Chris. (2020): A Court of Specialists: Judicial Behavior on the UK Supreme Court (Oxford, Oxford University Press).
HAYNIE, Stacia L. (1994): “Resource Inequalities and Litigation Outcomes in the Philippine Supreme Court”. The Journal of Politics 56, No. 3, pp. 752-772.
HERMANSEN, Silje; PAVONE, Tommaso; & BOULAZIZ, Louisa. (2023): Leveling and Spotlighting: How International Courts Refract Private Litigation to Build Institutional Legitimacy. Preprint (Politics and International Relations). https://doi.org/10.33774/apsa-2023-q9jbq. [Accessed on: July 10, 2024].
HILBINK, Lisa. (2012): “The Origins of Positive Judicial Independence”. World Politics 64, No. 4, pp. 587-621.
JOIGNANT, Alfredo; MORALES, Mauricio; & FUENTES, Claudio. (2017): “Malaise in Representation: Attitudes, Beliefs, Behaviors, and Causalities”. In JOIGNANT, Alfredo; MORALES, Mauricio; & FUENTES, Claudio. (eds.), Malaise in Representation in Latin American Countries (Cham, Palgrave Macmillan US).
KAPISZEWSKI, Diana; LEVITSKY, Steven; & YASHAR, Deborah J. (2021): “Inequality, Democracy, and the Inclusionary Turn in Latin America”. In KAPISZEWSKI, Diana; LEVITSKY, Steven; & YASHAR, Deborah J. (eds.), The Inclusionary Turn in Latin American Democracies (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).
KAPISZEWSKI, Diana; and TIEDE, Lydia B. (2021): “Empirical Studies of the Behavior of Justices and High Courts in Latin America: An Overview”. In GAROUPA, Nuno; GILL, Rebecca D.; & TIEDE, Lydia B. (eds.), High Courts in Global Perspective: Evidence, Methodologies, and Findings (Charlottesville, University of Virginia Press).
KITSCHELT, Herbert; HAWKINS, Kirk A.; LUNA, Juan Pablo; ROSAS, Guillermo; & ZECHMEISTER, Elizabeth J. (2010): “Patterns of Programmatic Party Competition in Latin America”. In KITSCHELT, Herbert; HAWKINS, Kirk A.; LUNA, Juan Pablo; ROSAS, Guillermo; &
ZECHMEISTER, Elizabeth J. (eds.), Latin American Party Systems, (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).
KRITZER, Herbert M. (2003): “The Government Gorilla. Why Does Government Come Out Ahead in Appellate Courts?”. In KRITZER, Herbert M. & SILBEY, Susan (eds.), Litigation: Do the “Haves” Still Come Out Ahead? (Stanford, Stanford University Press).
MAHON, James E.; BERGMAN, Marcelo; & ARNSON, Cynthia (eds.) (2015): Progressive Tax Reform and Equality in Latin America (Washington DC, Wilson Center).
MAINWARING, Scott; BIZZARRO, Fernando; & PETROVA, Ana. (2018): “Party System Institutionalization, Decay, and Collapse”. In MAINWARING, Scott (ed.), Party Systems in Latin America (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).
MANNING, Sara; & RANDAZZO, Kirk A. (2009): “Leveling the Playing Field? Litigant Success Rates in Health-Care Policy Cases in the U.S. Courts of Appeals”. Justice System Journal 30, No. 3, pp. 245-53.
MCCORMICK, Peter. (1993): “Party Capability Theory and Appellate Success in the Supreme Court of Canada, 1949–1992”. Canadian Journal of Political Science 26, No. 3, pp. 523-540.
MURO, Sergio; CHEHTMAN, Alejandro; SILVA MÉNDEZ, Jorge; & AMAYA DURÁN, Nelson. (2018): “Testing Representational Advantage in the Argentine Supreme Court”. Journal of Law and Courts 6, No. 1, pp. 1-23.
PÁEZ, Angela M. (2023): “Who Are You and What’s Your Issue? Winning in Collective Litigation in Colombia”. Latin American Research Review 58, No. 3, pp. 1-19.
RÍOS-FIGUEROA, Julio (2011): “Institutions for Constitutional Justice in Latin America”. In HELMKE, Gretchen; & RÍOS-FIGUEROA, Julio (eds.), Courts in Latin America (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).
RÍOS-FIGUEROA, Julio; & TAYLOR, Matthew M. (2006): “Institutional Determinants of the Judicialisation of Policy in Brazil and Mexico”. Journal of Latin American Studies 38, No. 4, pp. 739-766.
RIUS, Andrés (2015): “The Uruguayan Tax Reform of 2006: Why Didn’t It Fail?”. In MAHON, James E.; BERGMAN, Marcelo; & ARSNON, Cynthia (eds.), Progressive Tax Reform and Equality in Latin America (Washington, DC, Wilson Center).
RÓMBOLI, Luis. (2012): «Concentración de recursos». La Diaria (Montevideo), August 14, 2012. Available at: https://ladiaria.com.uy/politica/articulo/2012/8/concentracion-de-recursos/. [Accessed on: July 15, 2024].
SHEEHAN, Reginald; HAYNIE, Stacia; RANDAZZO, Kirk A.; & SONGER, Donald R. (2013): “Winners and Losers in Appellate Court Outcomes: A Comparative Perspective”. Paper presented at the American Political Science Association Annual Meeting 2013. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2300530. [Accessed on July 20, 2024].
SHEEHAN, Reginald S.; MISHLER, William; & SONGER, Donald R. (1992): “Ideology, Status, and The Differential Success of Direct Parties Before the Supreme Court”. American Political Science Review 86, No. 2, pp. 464-71.
SKIPLE, Jon Kåre; BENTSEN, Henrik Litleré; & McKENZIE, Mark Jonathan. (2021): “How Docket Control Shapes Judicial Behavior: A Comparative Analysis of the Norwegian and Danish Supreme Courts”. Journal of Law and Courts 9, No. 1, pp. 111-36.
SONGER, Donald R.; SHEEHAN, Reginald S.; & BRODIE HAIRE, Susan. (1999): “Do the ‘Haves’ Come out Ahead over Time? Applying Galanter’s Framework to Decisions of the U.S. Courts of Appeals, 1925-1988”. Law & Society Review 33, No. 4.
SONGER, Donald R.; & SHEEHAN, Reginald S. (1992): “Who Wins on Appeal? Upperdogs and Underdogs in the United States Courts of Appeals”. American Journal of Political Science 36, No. 1.
SZMER, John; SONGER, Donald R.; & BOWIE, Jennifer. (2016): “Party Capability and the US Courts of Appeals: Understanding Why the ‘Haves’ Win”. Journal of Law and Courts 4, No. 1, pp. 65-102.
TAYLOR, Matthew M. (2008): Judging Policy: Courts and Policy Reform in Democratic Brazil (Stanford, Stanford University Press).
TAYLOR, Whitney K. (2020): “On the Social Construction of Legal Grievances: Evidence From Colombia and South Africa”. Comparative Political Studies 53, No. 8, pp. 1326-1356.
TRUJILLO, Henry. (2023): «El acceso a la justicia: análisis de brechas, caminos y vulnerabilidad a las demandas a partir de la Encuesta de necesidades legales de Uruguay en 2021». Revista de la Facultad de Derecho No. 55, pp. 1-24.
VANHALA, Lisa. (2018): “Is Legal Mobilization for the Birds? Legal Opportunity Structures and Environmental Nongovernmental Organizations in the United Kingdom, France, Finland, and Italy”. Comparative Political Studies 51, No. 3, pp. 380-412.
VANHALA, Lisa. (2011): Making Rights a Reality? Disability Rights Activists and Legal Mobilization (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).
WHEELER, Stanton; CARTWRIGTH, Bliss; KAGAN, Robert; & FRIEDMAN, Lawrence. (1987): “Do the ‘Haves’ Come Out Ahead? Winning and Losing in State Supreme Courts, 1870–1970”. Law and Society Review 21, No. 3, pp. 403-445.
WILSON, Bruce M. (2009): “Institutional Reform and Rights Revolutions in Latin America: The Cases of Cost Rica and Colombia”. Journal of Politics in Latin America 1, No. 2, pp. 59-85.
WORLD BANK. (2024): “Overview: Uruguay”. Available at: <https://www.worldbank.org/ext/en/country/uruguay> [Accessed on: December 1, 2024].
WORLD JUSTICE PROJECT. (2023): Dissecting the Justice Gap in 104 Countries. WJP Justice Data Graphical Report I (Washington DC, The World Justice Project).
Statutes cited
CÓDIGO GENERAL DEL PROCESO. (1988). General Procedural Code – Ley No. 15.982. Available at: https://www.impo.com.uy/bases/codigo-general-proceso/15982-1988. [Accessed on: December 10, 2024].
CONSTITUCIÓN (Uruguayan Constitution). (1967). Constitución de la República Oriental del Uruguay. Available at: https://www.impo.com.uy/bases/constitucion/1967-1967. [Accessed on: December 10, 2024].
URUGUAYAN LAW 18,572. (2009). On the Reduction of the Maximum Duration of Labor Proceedings. Available at: https://www.impo.com.uy/bases/leyes/18572-2009. [Accessed on: December 10, 2024].
URUGUAYAN LAW 18,847. (2011). Which amends Law 18,572, on the Reduction of the Maximum Duration of Labor Proceedings. Available at: https://www.impo.com.uy/bases/leyes/18847-2011. [Accessed on: December 10, 2024].
URUGUAYAN LAW 19,120. (2013). On Law on Minor Offences. Available at: https://www.impo.com.uy/diariooficial/2013/08/28/4. [Accessed on: December 10, 2024].
URUGUAYAN LAW 19,679. (2018). Amending Articles 18 and 21 of Law 19,120 and Article 25 of Law 19,293. Available at: https://www.impo.com.uy/bases/leyes/19679-2018. [Accessed on: December 10, 2024].
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2026 Florencia Antía Aguñín, Yoana Cabrera, Fabricio Carneiro, Daniela Vairo