Context and differences from the south african social rights’ experience for the chilean constitutional process

Published 2022-09-02
Section Derecho

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7770/rchdcp-V12N2-art2698

Keywords:

Constitution, social and economic rights, deference, reasonableness, South Africa

Abstract

This article intends to present to a local audience how the adjudication of social and economic rights works in the South African Constitution and what lessons could be applied in writing the new Chilean Constitution. We identify and give an overview of the two main factors that underlie the entire system: noticeable deference to the political authorities regarding implementing policies that operationalize these rights and the so-called reasonableness test. Given the differences in legal culture, political system, and expectations people have of the new constitution, it would be hard to copy these institutions and transplant them to Chile.  

Author Biographies

Luis Antonio León Arzich, New York University, New York, Estados Unidos de Norteamérica

E-Mail: lla255@nyu.edu

Andrés Ignacio Torrejón Correa, PricewaterhouseCoopers Chile, Santiago, Chile

E-Mail: aitorrejon@uc.cl

Antonella Gema León Arzich, Fundación ARCA, Santiago, Chile

E-Mail: agleon@uc.cl